Others Believe That Government Funding of the Arts Threatens the Integrity of the Arts

GRE 作文题目 来源于朗播用户：杨天放

Some people believe that regime funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts tin flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. [Specific Task Teaching: Write a response in which you lot talk over which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position yous take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.]

题目分析

翻译

一些人认为：政府应该资助艺术家来帮助艺术蓬勃发展，同时让人们都能得以接触到艺术。另一些人认为：政府对艺术的资助威胁到了艺术的纯洁性。[说明：写一篇文章，讨论哪一个观点更加接近你自己的观点，并解释你选择这个观点的理由。在展开和支持你的观点时，你需要处理上面提到的两个观点]

指导

写一篇文章，讨论你同意或反对这个观点，以及支持观点的理由达到怎样的程度。（Claim – Reason） "本题为两道老GRE的ISSUE题目综合——ISSUE101 ""Governments should provide funding for artists so that the arts can flourish and be bachelor to all people""和ISSUE85 ""Government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts"".本题讨论政府应当对艺术采取的行为以及其目的和作用。 第一种观点中：对于题目中的前半句，可以从政府扶持艺术的正面与负面作用以及对艺术"物质、精神"两层次的影响去展开分析。对于后半句，可以从政府行为的必要性以及人们不同的需求层次上进行论述。 第二种观点里：给出的观点认为政府资助对艺术的纯洁性造成了威胁，具有负面作用。本题的分析可以从物质需求和精神追求两个角度展开，需要注意以下三点： 1、单词解释——Integrity一词比较有争议，这里选取韦氏字典中纯洁性的解释：firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values : incorruptibility 2、逻辑关系——无论是正面作用还是负面作用，都要建立在"政府"和"艺术"之间，不要跳出限定范围。 two、选取例子——梵高等人已经被用烂了，这个题目和艺术有关，小说、电影、音乐、绘画等都可以包括，有很多事例是可以使用。"

ane. 艺术的蓬勃发展需要什么基础？艺术如何让所有人都可以接触到？（可以从物质和精神两方面来思考）

回答： 艺术的蓬勃发展需要人民有安全舒适的生活环境以及自由的空间，同时，需要人民有自由的思想。艺术可以通过多种艺术形式，公开地或不公开地，在艺术家与人民之间，人民与人民之间传播。

2. 政府资助艺术的目的是什么？对政府有什么好处？政府资助能满足问题一中艺术的哪些需求？

回答： 政府资助艺术的目的是推动艺术的发展，满足人们的文化需求，增加人们的幸福感和满足感，对政府的好处是能够让人们对政府更加满意，并且会让搞艺术的人更加支持政府。政府资助能满足问题一中人们所需要的安全舒适的生活环境，以及自由的空间。

3. 政府资助对艺术会有哪些负作用？请结合具体事例简述。

回答： 政府对艺术的资助会让被资助者失去一定的独立性，俗话说"拿钱办事"，某些艺术家会按照政府的意愿做艺术，并且造成一定的不公平现象。比如（我还真不知道）

four. 艺术在获得政府资助之后，相对于之前会有什么样的变化？这些变化有哪些是正面的，哪些是负面的？

回答： 艺术在获得政府资助之后，相对于之前会在物质层面更加奢华，也许会更加宏大，占用的资源更多，这些变化中，能够更加丰富地展现艺术形式的部分是正面的，然而盲目追求华丽和奢侈的部分是负面的。

five. 是否存在为了保持艺术纯洁性而拒绝政府资助的事例？是否存在接受政府资助之后丧失艺术纯洁性的事例？如果有，请简单描述事例。

回答： 这个……我还真不知道。

half dozen. 艺术的纯洁性是指什么？包括那些方面？怎样的行为就属于威胁或者丧失艺术的纯洁性？

回答： 艺术的纯洁性指艺术的创作者在创作艺术时不被非艺术的因素所干扰，如政治、商业等，是出于对艺术的热爱而创作艺术。利用金钱、权力来收买、要挟或与艺术创作者进行交易的行为会威胁或使艺术的纯洁性丧失。

其他用户的回答

作文

Some people believe that authorities funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts tin flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that authorities funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art plays an important part in modern society. Past appreciating art, people could gain happiness and sympathize their cultures more. To better new kinds of art, money and other resource are needed. So, someone believes that authorities should requite funding to arts to ensure that the arts tin can flourish and be available to all people. Notwithstanding, others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts, and I have similar views.
Admittedly, government funding of fine art could be helpful. Numerous monuments and statures were completed with the money given by governments. Artists have skillful ideas but often lack resources. If governments could help them, their dreams might come true much more easily.
Yet, it is highly possible that government funding of arts is biased. Some kind of arts are welcomed by the regime while others not. But, what the regime favors may not be enjoyed by public. During the cultural revolution in China in 1960s, many different kinds of arts which propagated Chairman Mao were funded and the authority liked them very much. Nonetheless, traditional arts which were esteemed every bit masterpieces were spoiled during that fourth dimension. The regime funding of fine art turned out to be a severe interference to the arts at that time.
In addition, as pointed out in the issue, the integrity of the arts could be threatened past regime funding. For case, in Beijing many new fine art museums were built in the by five years and new exhibitions were held. But when I entered these museums, I saw similar forms of arts which even seemed to be created by the aforementioned one. The pictures were full of beautiful colors but lack thoughts and were away from nature. Many artists who were extremely prolific regarded art as a way to earn money instead of appreciating the beauty of nature. By contrast, in a special commune called "798" in Beijing, the arts are flourished vastly. It used to exist a factory and was abased nigh 10 years agone. No one lived there and information technology was non supervised past the government. But this surface area has two important features for the arts to flourish: liberty and serenity. More and more artists showed interest on 798. Today, it became the center of fine art in Beijing.Notwithstanding until at present, the regime hasn't give ane yuan to those artists.
Though government funding of fine art is productive on some occasions, and some artists may benefit numerously by government funding, governments have other ways to help the arts. To sum upward, the advantages of doing so are less than the disadvantages. So I believe that government funding of fine art is not a skillful selection.

robertsonannothe.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.langlib.com/Writing/BrainStorming/compositionguide/NDQ5NDU=

Share this post